Grant letter: funding stable, but uncertainty for next year

University funding levels will remain broadly similar next year to those announced in 2014, the government’s annual grant letter has today confirmed

January 30, 2015

Total funding for universities from the Higher Education Funding Council for England will stand at just over £4 billion in 2015-16, “essentially unchanged” from the indicative allocations set out in last year’s grant letter, the government says.

It estimates total funding available to universities – Hefce funding plus estimated fee income – will rise from £11.1 billion to £12.1 billion in 2015-16.

However, unlike previous years, the letter does not set out indicative funding levels for two years ahead, raising the prospect the Hefce budget could be slashed in 2016-17 following the expected post-election spending review.

The grant letter also suggests the criteria for funding research will remain unchanged, stating Hefce should “continue selectively to fund world-leading and internationally excellent research wherever it is found”.

The letter, which is signed by business secretary Vince Cable and universities and science minister Greg Clark, also calls on universities to do more to increase the number of female vice-chancellors and senior managers.

“Many universities have also taken some steps to address diversity in their senior management teams, but with only one in five female vice-chancellors there is definitely room for improvement,” said Mr Cable in a press release accompanying the letter.

The letter stops short of recommending quotas for the sector, but Mr Cable called on institutions to “mirror the excellent progress that has been made in the FTSE 100 boardrooms” – which were set a target of 25 per cent of their members to be women in a review by Lord Davies in 2011.

Meanwhile, the letter also appears to hand the administrative process for giving degree awarding powers to Hefce from BIS, along with decisions on university title and who can be designated for access to student loans.

There is additional funding in the letter to support new government priorities including a review of accreditation of computer science but teaching funding priorities remain the same; Hefce is asked to continue to protect, “as far as possible, funding for high cost subjects…widening participation, and small and specialist institutions”.

Grants for individual universities and colleges will be published on 31 March.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (1)

For those interested, the previous Scottish Cabinet Secretary Mike Russell announced on his last day in office a cut of £21M in QR funding (known as Global Excellence Initiative scheme). This will hit hardest the science research intensives, Edinburgh can be expected to lose £10M approx. Coupled to the normal 'efficiency' savings, it will be a bleak year for some Scottish Universities.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham