Give online portals some commercial polish

Universities are missing out on applications, as well as thousands of pounds in income, because their websites are outdated and unappealing to prospective students, a digital agency has warned.

October 4, 2012

Many institutions fail to treat applicants as online consumers and need to take steps to make their websites more like e-commerce giants such as Amazon, according to Nomensa in a report titled Enhancing the University Submission Experience.

The document claims that the increase in tuition fees has made students increasingly discerning when deciding whether or not to go on to higher education, and so a good website design is vital.

Simon Norris, chief executive of the agency, said that universities "are sadly lacking in their provision of online support to students at key points in their decision-making".

He added that institutions needed to "wake up" to the fact that deciding where to go to university was now at least partly motivated by money, and that today's students were used to viewing high-quality websites before parting with large amounts of cash.

"If universities are not presenting information to prospective students in a way that the prospective students expect, then they are setting themselves up for a very tough time commercially," he said.

Mr Norris added that certain universities stood to benefit more than others from developing their websites. Those within the Russell Group of research-intensive universities had a reputation that would "sustain them for the time being", he said.

Sheila MacNeill, assistant director of the Centre for Educational Technology and Interoperability Standards at the higher education IT consortium Jisc, agreed that there were problems across the board in the quality of university websites, often because of how they are created.

"Many look like they have been designed by committee because so many stakeholders want to get something listed on the front page," she said.

"Everyone wants their own bit of information on display. There is also a tension between what a university's marketing team feels it has to show, such as achievements in research, and what students really want to see."

chris.parr@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show