German bio plan is 'not a threat'

October 15, 1999

Fears that the massive state-backed expansion of the biotechnology sector in Germany threatens Britain's leadership in the field in Europe are unfounded, according to a study.

Over the past year Germany has rapidly increased its number of biotechnology companies from 170 to over 220, sparking concern in the UK that the expansion could threaten the sector at home.

The expansion has been generously funded through the German government's Bio Regio programme with an annual budget of Pounds 50 million, part of a Pounds 125 million-a-year support initiative.

But Philip Cooke, of the University of Wales, Cardiff, argues that the heavy interventionist German policy for the sector, in contrast to Britain's more market-driven approach, is unlikely to lead to many successful German biotechnology companies.

In a study for the Department of Trade and Industry he estimates that of the 220 existing firms, less than a dozen will survive the next ten years.

He said: "The problem for the sector across Europe is lack of support for new companies. Germany has tried to address the problem through state support for start-ups but eventually it will hit the same problem as every other country, providing the second more substantial injection of capital for the companies three to five years down the road. It is hard to see how the public sector can provide it."

The study estimates that Pounds 4 billion to Pounds 12 billion would be required in developmental financing for just 50 of the German firms to eventually succeed in placing one product on the market in ten years.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University