Funders row boils over at Oxford's IMM

February 6, 1998

A row over conflicts of interest at Oxford University's multi-funded Institute of Molecular Medicine reached fever pitch this week, as staff rejected a proposed review of its administration by a university bureaucrat on behalf of a funder, writes Phil Baty.

Following revelations of long-term acrimony between the institute's academics and its funders last week, Oxford's secretary of the chest, John Clements, is proposing to lead a review of the award-winning institute's administration on behalf of the Medical Research Council.

But staff at the institute, co-funded by the university, the Wellcome Trust and the MRC, are angry the review will be conducted by a bureaucrat with no official decision-making powers.

It is feared the funders want more control over the administration, and want to remove a long-serving female member of staff.

Fergus Millar, a member of Oxford's governing council, has confirmed he has "raised the issue" of the dispute with the council.

He said he would not comment on "confidential" council business until it is resolved, but sources close to the dispute confirmed that he has demanded to know who authorised the review and what authority Mr Clements had to make decisions.

Professor Sir David Weatherall, director of the institute, was in California as The THES went to press. John Clegg, deputy director, confirmed he had written to the secretary of Oxford's general board, expressing his concern about the legality of the review but would not comment further.

One source said: "The funders seem to do what they like. It makes no sense to have a bureaucrat trying to resolve a problem like this; it will just compound it."

Mr Clements, as secretary of the chest, has no formal decision-making powers, a spokeswoman for Oxford confirmed. He "is responsible for facilitating the review of the administration at the Institute," she said. "He will be reporting the information to the Medical Research Council and the university. The institute is under the management of the MRC. He is not responsible for decision-making."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns