French academics fear for freedom amid Islamic terrorism row

French scholars, accused of fostering terrorism, fear escalating rhetoric could curtail freedom of research

November 26, 2020
 A member of the crowd watching the National Tribute to the murdered school teacher Samuel Paty holds a placard reading 'Do not touch my Professor' at Place de la Sorbonne on October 21, 2020 in Paris, France.
Source: Getty

French academics fear being targeted by politicians from across the political spectrum in the run-up to the 2022 presidential election after the country’s education minister accused universities of creating an intellectual breeding ground for Islamic terrorism.

Following the beheading in mid-October of a teacher who showed pupils cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, researchers who focus on areas such as racism, Islamophobia and French colonialism have come in for unprecedented attack from parts of Emmanuel Macron’s government – which was initially seen as a bastion against right-wing populism – and from fellow academics.

“Linking all this to terrorism is what’s new,” said Simon Dawes, a media lecturer at the Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines.

Academics were now accused of having “blood on your hands” for conducting certain types of research, argued Dr Dawes, who has warned that academic freedom of speech could be under threat.

In the aftermath of Samuel Paty’s murder, Jean-Michel Blanquer, the education minister, claimed that “left-wing Islamism” was “wreaking havoc” in French universities.

Doubling down on these comments, he later said it was necessary to “fight” intellectual currents coming from US universities that viewed society through the lens of ethnic origin, religion or gender – rather than the French republican ideal of equality – because they risked the “fragmentation” of society and created a “vision of the world which converges with the interests of the Islamists”.

France’s Conference of University Presidents (CPU) was forced to hit back, denying that universities were complicit in terrorism.

Since then, 100 academics have publicly backed Mr Blanquer’s comments, accusing “racialist” and post-colonial scholars of “feeding an anti-white racism and a hatred of France”.

In some ways, this debate mirrors developments in the US and the UK, where some right-wingers worry that certain academic standpoints are unfairly whipping up resentment against state and country. In recent months, both Donald Trump, the outgoing US president, and a minister in Britain’s Conservative government have attacked critical race theory, a framework in the social sciences that examines racism embedded in the law and legal institutions.

In France, however, academics exploring such areas are assailed from several sides – by the far right and also by staunch republican secularists in Mr Macron’s government and academia. Current polling points to a run-off between Mr Macron and a representative of the far-right National Rally come the presidential election in April 2022.

“For the French centrist government to be adding its voice is dangerous,” said Dr Dawes.

The furore came close to leading to real changes in the law. France’s Senate initially amended a new research law to state that academic freedom must be exercised “in respect of the values of the republic”, a change that prompted the CPU to demand the law be clarified and rewritten. It was only toned down by the Senate at the last moment. 

This amendment would have been “very bad” for autonomy of thought in universities, said Rose-Marie Lagrave, director of studies at the Paris-based School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (EHESS). Dr Dawes said the amendment would have left him unclear whether he could raise criticisms of French republican values, such as secularism, in his teaching.

One of the academics backing the minister is Nathalie Heinich, research director for sociology at the EHESS. The issue was not that universities studied areas such as racism and French colonialism, which was as it should be, she said. Instead, the problem was “activist” academics who used research to create “a victim mentality” among minorities in France.

“The problem is now in French universities there has been a fashionable importation of American identity politics,” she said. Claims by academics of “systematic racism” and “state racism” were “a direct encouragement to terrorism”, she told Times Higher Education.

Still, there is no evidence of any link between universities and Mr Paty’s killer, the 18-year-old Abdullakh Anzorov, a Russian of Chechen origin who moved to France as a child refugee, nor the Tunisian man who stabbed three people in Nice later in October.

“I don’t think if you take someone who’s beheaded someone, they’re avid readers of Judith Butler,” remarked Dr Dawes, referring to the pioneering American gender theorist.

There are fears that the escalating rhetoric has already created a more hostile environment for French scholars. Dr Dawes pointed to the cancellation in early November of an academic colloquium on feminism after online harassment by far-right trolls.

One of the organisers of the event, Sylvie Chaperon, a history professor at the University of Toulouse-Jean Jaurès, said that while it was hard to link the harassment directly to the minister’s comments, universities had been weakened by them.

“They undermine our credibility and fuel hostility towards us,” she said. “We need support and commitment and not unfounded criticism.”

However, there are splits in the French government over whether to accuse universities of laying the intellectual groundwork for terrorism. Frédérique Vidal, the higher education minister, has not echoed Mr Blanquer’s rhetoric, tweeting instead that universities are “not places of radicalisation” and that “more than ever” research was needed to understand the origins of Islamic radicalism.

david.matthews@timeshighereducation.com

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Scholars fear for freedom amid Islamic terrorism row

Please Login or Register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Any intellectual exploration of topics such as colonialism and racism if dispassionately done must create anger regret and resentments in varying degrees and with varying emotional adjustments or recalibration by the listening or watching audience. Should such reactions reach into terrorist reprisals ? Not necessarily unless contemporary situations continue to deepen the historical cruelties inherent in colonialism. The proper thing to do for remediation, one would think, will not be to put intellectual forays into shackles by knee jerk responses from government or society ( playing possum or proverbial ostrich is anti-intellectual cowardice ) but to show in practical terms whst productive lessons society has learnt from its unproud past and what remedial actions are being aggressively installed. The latter far more than the former ( putting academics on a leash ) will reduce the ranks of intending terrorists or radicalization to an ineffective subset. Painful histories are thus balmed on all sides. Basil jide fadipe.
This is a very dangerous area, but one that is ignored at potentially greater cost to society. Western society and Universities have bent over backwards to accommodate Islam, and with each accommodation the demands for more ratchet up ever further. Separate prayer rooms and separate washing facilities (essential otherwise Disabled toilets are left flooded and dangerously slippery by those performing wudu) may or may not unreasonable, though not teaching on Fridays is. The real danger is the ideological lefts inability to see those whose votes they think will enable their election/politics can be controlled, Islam is a system for life and will not bend to the lefts demands or attempts at control, ultra conservative hard-line Islam especially so. Though they have learnt since 1683 a frontally assault is less effective and more costly than a slow almost imperceptible demographic take over some will always be willing to martyr themselves.

Sponsored