FP7 priorities should mirror those of Lisbon agenda, concludes Parliament

March 14, 2005

Brussels, 11 Mar 2005

The European Parliament has adopted a report on the Commission's proposals for future EU research policy, calling for the main research topics under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) to reflect the strategic priorities of the updated Lisbon agenda.

During a plenary session on 10 March, MEPs adopted the own-initiative report by Italian Member Pia Locatelli on the Commission communication 'Science and technology - guidelines for future European Union policy to support research'.

The Parliament agrees with the Commission that more funding is needed for research and innovation if the EU is to improve its competitiveness. 'They therefore want the percentage of Member States' GDP represented by the FP7 budget to be at least doubled and not put up for discussion during the negotiations on the financial perspective,' reads a Parliament statement.

While signalling their broad support for the Commission's proposals, MEPs nevertheless called for procedures within the framework programme to be made clearer and simpler. The programme, they said, should also be influenced by a genuine debate among EU and national institutions, the scientific community and industry.

On the thematic priorities for FP7, the Parliament welcomed the Commission's proposal to include space research and security, but stressed that it also wants to see continued support for research into the life sciences, nanotechnology and chemicals. MEPs singled out renewable energy and energy efficiency research for increased support, and called for more EU resources to be spent on under-funded research into illnesses affecting developing countries.

Finally, the Parliament gave its backing to proposals to establish a European Research Council (ERC). Members would like to see the body established swiftly, although they stressed that 'it must avoid duplication with existing bodies such as the Joint Research Centre [...], have adequate funding and avoid generating more red tape.' To follow the debate on the future of EU research policy, please visit: http://www.cordis.lu/era/fp7.htm

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities
Item source: http:///dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?C ALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN= EN_RCN_ID:23502 Previous Item Back to Titles Print Item

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October