FP6 rules of participation compromise approved

June 21, 2002

Brussels, 20 June 2002

A unanimous vote by committee MEPs approving a compromise deal on the rules of participation in the Sixth Framework programme took place on 19 June.

The vote, by the European Parliament's Industry, external trade, research and energy committee, approved a compromise deal reached by MEP rapporteur Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl and the Spanish Presidency. The compromise addresses most of the issues that had been raised by MEPs. A two stage procedure will now take place, whereby a brief description of a proposal will be submitted and evaluated before a more complete description is requested.

The criteria on which projects and proposals will be evaluated will change.

Most important will be the scientific and technological excellence of an application, along with its degree of innovation. Following this, other factors such as synergies with education, capacity to engage with actors beyond the research community and activities which increase the role of women, will all be considered.

The original report on the issue had been removed from the June plenary session of Parliament so as to allow for technical and linguistic amendments to be made, but the compromise is now expected to be presented to the next plenary session, due to start in Strasbourg on 1 July.

For further information, please contact:

Leena Maria Linnus
Tel: +32-2-2842825
E-mail: indu-press@europarl.eu.int

CORDIS RTD-NEWS/© European Communities, 2001

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns