Foreign students may look elsewhere, UK warned

March 24, 2011

The UK has long had "more than its fair share" of international students, and must reconcile itself to the fact that things are going to change.

This warning was made by Richard Yelland, head of the Education Management and Infrastructure Division at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. He pointed to countries such as Japan, which plans to increase its international student body to 300,000 by 2020, to back up his point.

"The international market has always been there for some countries, but we're getting to the stage where more are realising it exists," Mr Yelland told Times Higher Education.

The UK's share of the student market may be further diminished by changes instituted after last year's review of higher education by Lord Browne of Madingley, he said.

"International students who are trying to understand the system may be thinking twice about what their options are," he said.

But Mr Yelland was positive about the UK's fees system.

"The UK should be commended for having set out to devise a system that is sustainably financed, with measures to try to improve quality and efficiency," he said.

He added that the OECD was broadly in favour of the developments in the country.

"The combination of charging a fee, providing a loan that is based on achieving a certain level of income before you pay it back, and backing it up with grants and scholarships for certain people seems to us to be the right approach," he said.

Arguing that, for tertiary education, "free is not fair", he added: "In every country of which I am aware, the upper socio-economic groups have a better rate of access to higher education than the others.

"In countries where there are no tuition fees, it is still the case that there is a bias towards socially advantaged groups."

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

Senior Lecturer in Law

University Of The West Of England (uwe)

Lecturer in Marketing

Edinburgh Napier University

Resource Planner

Bpp University