Fight fixed-term work, research councils entreated

UCU argues that a rise in project-based grants fuel job insecurity and deter postgraduates from working in academia

December 11, 2014

Research councils should encourage rather than discourage the permanent employment of academic staff in UK universities, a report says.

The policy statement from the University and College Union warns that the increasing predominance of project-based grants over block grant funding for institutions has left many researchers’ positions dependent on the winning of fresh awards.

It suggests that figures from the Higher Education Statistics Agency, which indicate that 67 per cent of full-time research staff are on fixed-term contracts, “heavily underestimate” the level of actual casualisation because many other positions are open-ended rather than permanent.

The report, Seeing the Bigger Picture: The Future of UK Research and Development, argues that the precariousness of a career in higher education puts off postgraduates, who fear that they will be unable to settle in one location.

According to government figures, 60 per cent of PhD finishers are working outside the sector within three and a half years of completion, while the Royal Society estimates that only 3.5 per cent of science PhDs stay in academia for their whole career.

“No other profession appears to be willing to sacrifice its experienced and able workforce on such a regular basis on the flimsy argument that we need to make ‘space’ for ‘fresh blood’,” writes report author Rob Copeland, a UCU policy officer.

The UCU calls for prioritisation of block grant funding over project-based support, and suggests a longer duration for project-based grants. Other proposals include the introduction of a condition on grants requiring universities to reduce their reliance on fixed-term staff, and support for the development of national and regional talent pools that would assist researchers in securing work.

The report, published on 11 December, also calls for transparency in the relationship between the government and research councils.

It says this would clarify the extent to which ministers are directing funding decisions, claiming that there is some evidence that the coalition administration “has gone further than previous ones in using its control of the finances to ensure greater compliance with a government-led agenda”.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations