Evolution of pop scientists

May 24, 1996

Why is Jon Turney so sour about John Brockman and so scornful of his authors (THES, May 10)?

Brockman's achievement is to have persuaded regular scientists to write for a general audience. That has been a crying need for decades.

To say that Richard Dawkins's books are all "the same book" because they describe the "ways of the selfish gene" is as absurd as it would be to complain that Darwin's many books were all the same because they are built around the theory of natural selection.

The fact that Brockman is my agent and Dawkins is a friend of mine does not affect the issue.

John Maddox Pitt Street London W8

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns