ERC must ditch ménage à trois for new 'friends'

July 14, 2011

The European Research Council should be reorganised and given more autonomy to end the sense of a "ménage à trois" involving its governing and executive branches and the European Commission.

That is the conclusion of a report, published this week, on how the council should be structured in the next European Union funding period, beginning in 2014.

The ERC was set up at the beginning of the EU's Seventh Framework Programme in 2007 with a remit to fund basic research.

According to the ERC task force report, it has "fulfilled and perhaps surpassed the very high expectations placed upon it by the research community and political actors".

It also provides a "powerful dynamic for driving up the quality of the European research system" by offering a "gold standard" in peer review and by stimulating universities to compete to host an ERC-funded principal investigator.

But the task force, consisting of representatives from the council and the Commission, admits that "sub-optimalities" have resulted from the overlapping responsibilities of the Commission and the ERC's governing and executive branches.

It says that more responsibility for deciding on scientific programmes should be passed from the Commission to the ERC's governing science council. It also says that the council's president should be based in Brussels and spend at least 80 per cent of his or her time on ERC business. The current ERC president, Helga Nowotny, is based in Vienna.

The report suggests that the Commission relax its "prescriptive approach" to overseeing the ERC executive agency and minimise bureaucratic demands on researchers, such as timesheets and institutional audits. It also recommends the creation of a "friends of the ERC" foundation that could accept philanthropic donations without the money becoming subject to standard restrictions on EU spending. This would allow donations to be earmarked for specific projects.

Maire Geoghegan-Quinn, commissioner for research, innovation and science, said action would be taken to "get the ERC on the best possible footing for the future".

paul.jump@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show