EPSRC's lifeline for 'problem' sciences

October 8, 2004

A select list of universities has been invited to bid for grants from a multimillion-pound pilot fund designed to save "problem" science subjects.

The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council science and innovation awards, which were announced this week, will allow universities to bring additional research staff into strategically important areas of science and engineering that have a poor researcher head count.

Twenty-five universities have been asked to submit expressions of interest, chosen either because they already do a lot of work with the EPSRC or because they have a strong reputation in an important but threatened discipline.

John O'Reilly, EPSRC chief executive, told The Times Higher this week: "We are not looking for other universities to apply. We don't want to gear up a huge number of applications for what will necessarily be a limited number of grants."

A typical grant will be between £3 million and £5 million over five years. Professor O'Reilly said the council had £10 million for the pilot phase.

The council wishes to focus on problem areas such as statistics, the interface between chemistry and chemical engineering, energy research (nuclear science and engineering) and physical organic chemistry.

Universities will be expected to use the funding to bring in new people rather than to subsidise established posts. The council aims to fund "significant" teams consisting of three academic staff, three postdoctorate researchers and three PhD students.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns