EP Briefing 2002-07-01: MEPs urge 0.5% threshold for labelling of authorised GMOs (codecision - amendments to draft regulation)

June 26, 2002

Strasbourg, 25 June 2002

Reporting for the Environment Committee Karin SCHEELE (PES, D) will be presenting a second draft legislative resolution on GMOs focussing on the authorisation and labelling of genetically modified food and feed.

The Commission proposal provides for a threshold above which food or feed accidentally contaminated with non-authorised GMOs must be labelled. However, the committee is against establishing any threshold for non-authorised GMOs, as this would undermine EU legislation on bio-safety. For accidental contamination with authorised GMOs, the committee is proposing an amendment reducing the proposed threshold from 1% to 0.5%.

MEPs are also against any revision of the current Directive 2001/18/EC after the complicated conciliation procedure that took place last year. It was felt that this new regulation should complement it instead. Lastly, amendments on the public's right to information and on the participation of national and local authorities in the authorisation procedure are being proposed.


Karin SCHEELE (PES, A)
Report on the proposal for a European Parliament and Council regulation on genetically modified food and feed
(COM(2001) 425 - C5-0368/2001 - 2001/0173(COD))
Doc.: A5-0225/2002 [may not be available yet]


Procedure: Codecisoin procedure (1st reading)
Debate: 02.07.200

European Parliament Briefing 2002-07-01
http://www.europarl.eu.int/home/default en.htm

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns