Engage Competition winners feature zombies and sensory delights

Cardiff University’s CAER Heritage Project announced as overall winner for engagement with the public

June 19, 2014

An interactive fibreglass rhino called Erica, a collaborative graphic novel about low-carbon pasts and futures and a choir dedicated to reviving the forgotten music of 16th-century nuns were just three of the 23 university projects shortlisted for the first national Engage Competition, which aims to reward academics for work in engaging with the public.

The judges chose winners and runners-up in eight categories, from more than 230 entries, for a ceremony held at London’s Natural History Museum on 11 June.

In the science, technology, engineering and maths category, the prize went to the University of Edinburgh’s “night of immersive theatre”, where “an unknown pathogen ravages Scotland’s capital”. Surrounded by “bloodthirsty ambling beasts”, the few remaining uninfected citizens at “The Enlightenment Café: Deadinburgh” could seek the help of immunologists as they faced a terrible dilemma: whether to “cull the infected, search for a cure, or destroy Edinburgh”.

Among established projects, the judges favoured the University of the West of England and University of Bristol’s joint danceroom Spectroscopy programme, which allows participants to “step into an interactive atomic simulation”, and so experience – and then manipulate – often startlingly beautiful images of themselves as energy fields.

Presenting the awards, which were organised by the National Co-ordinating Centre for Public Engagement, television presenter Alice Roberts, professor of public engagement in science at the University of Birmingham, urged universities to ensure that “public engagement is not detrimental to researchers’ careers”. But she also advised academics to “avoid arrogance” and to “never lose the thread of your argument by taking steps out”.

Although praising a range of projects engaging schoolchildren, mental health service users, prisoners and Parkinson’s patients, the judges selected Cardiff University’s CAER Heritage Project as overall winner.

This focused on a prehistoric monument in the city known as the Caerau Hillfort, surrounded by housing estates on three sides. The archaeologists and historians promoted participation through community excavations, exhibitions, adult learners’ courses and heritage trails. Two participants who went up to receive the award wore shirts saying “I dig Caerau”.


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (1)

The competition finalists covered a wide range of public engagement with research projects. You can check them out at: www.publicengagement.ac.uk//work-with-us/competition/competition-finalists The CAER project fought off tough opposition to win the overall award. Judges said this project 'had it all' and were impressed it offered opportunities for community members and researchers to co-produce knowledge.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry