Employers ‘to drive retraining demand’

Australian report suggests that business economics, not workers’ survival, will drive lifelong learning boom

June 11, 2019
lifelong learning
Source: iStock

Lifelong learning will become increasingly entrenched not because of the unpredictability of work, but rather because employers will find it cheaper to retrain staff than replace them, according to a report.

Professional services firm Deloitte Australia has challenged labour forecasting truisms that the gig economy will take over, multiple careers will become the norm and traditional offices will be consigned to the scrapheap.

In a new analysis, Deloitte says Australians are staying in their jobs longer than ever, the rate of casualisation has not increased for a decade, self-employment is at record lows and most staff spurn opportunities to work remotely.

And despite rampant technological change, unemployment rates are at their lowest level in a decade in Europe and half a century in the US.

The report, The Path to Prosperity: Why the Future of Work Is Human, acknowledges that technology is upending skill needs. But the traits most in demand are “heart” skills such as customer service and leadership – capabilities in which “humans excel and digital technology has been less successful in automating or augmenting human effort”, the report says.

Far from making existing workers a disposable commodity, the trend will boost their stocks. “The skills that are needed are changing constantly, and recruiting to fill shortages is an expensive solution,” the report argues.

It says that by retraining current staff, employers avoid the risk of buying in the requisite skills. It cites claims that the cost of replacing a “bad hire” after six months can run to two and half times the person’s salary.

Australian businesses already spend A$4.6 billion (£2.5 billion) a year in training their workforces, the report concedes. But this is considerably less than the A$7 billion they invest in recruitment.

“The best way to avoid skills shortages in the future will be to flip the numbers – start spending on training instead of recruitment, because as skills shortages worsen, the cost of recruitment will only grow,” the report says.

The analysis says lifelong learning will largely take place on the job because formal training is too expensive – less because of tuition and living costs than the earnings people forgo while studying. Graduates are also dissatisfied with the workplace applicability of their skills, it says.

But universities have a key role to play through activities such as micro-credentialing and degree-level apprenticeships, the report adds.

john.ross@timeshighereducation.com

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Related articles

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Overseas branch campuses have mushroomed in the past two decades, but with the risks larger than initially assumed and the returns less certain, stories of abandoned ventures have begun to mount. Ellie Bothwell asks whether the model still has a future 

The University of Oxford is top in a list of the best universities in the UK, which includes institutions in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

26 September

Most Commented

Most universities still rely on exams and assessed essays to grade their students. But as the fourth industrial revolution, employability and student satisfaction all rise up the agenda, many experts are suggesting that assessment needs to much more closely resemble real-world tasks. Anna McKie marks the arguments   

23 May

Universities in most nations are now obliged to prioritise graduate career prospects, but how it should be approached depends on your view of the meaning of education. Academics need to think that through much more clearly, says Tom Cutterham

Sponsored