ELQ cuts prompt Church to rejig theology training

June 12, 2008

Hundreds of would-be church ministers will have to study two-year foundation degrees instead of their traditional diplomas as a result of the Government's decision to cut funding for students pursuing qualifications at an equivalent or lower level than those they already hold.

Three quarters of the 1,500 students training to become Church of England ministers at any one time hold degrees, and the Church spends £16.5 million a year on training.

With £100 million less in Government funding for ELQ students, many universities have said they will charge higher fees to make up the shortfall, which could cost the Church - which currently pays full tuition fees for ordinands - an extra £1.5 million a year.

Now the Higher Education Funding Council for England has given the churches a one-year reprieve to allow time to develop new types of courses that will be exempt from the cuts.

At the moment, in the case of the Church of England, most trainee ministers study for a diploma in ministry or a diploma in theology for ministry. The Church plans to adapt these into foundation degrees, which are exempt from the ELQ policy.

The Bishop of Norwich, the Right Reverend Graham James, said that while some traditional methods of delivery would need to be re-addressed to reflect "an increasingly practical emphasis" in ministerial training, the Church remained committed to offering academically stimulating courses.

rebecca.attwood@tsleducation.com.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October

Sponsored

Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University