Reports of the death of elitism in higher education are grossly exaggerated ('Populist Labour swells HE ranks', THES, October 1). Government targets for widening participation are to be welcomed. However, percentage rates of participation can mislead by masking the inequalities they are meant to redress.
Two years ago, The THES showed that the then 40 per cent participation rate glossed over the variation in participation of school-leavers from the most and least affluent areas. Participation among school-leavers from the less affluent neighbourhoods was shown to be below 10 per cent, compared with more than 50 per cent from the affluent areas. Simply raising the rate as a whole will not spark a revolution if the variation persists and the barriers remain.
Outreach work with schools and community groups is welcome. Ultimately, however, widening participation will need a commitment to change where it counts - in work done with students in classes and lecture theatres. The low status attached to this work is, indeed, a symptom of elitism.
Howard Stones Project development manager FDTL Project: Action Learning for Lifelong Professional Development Bradford College
Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber?Sign in now