Elite powers of concentration

Great news for Russell Group but bad tidings for its mission group competitors. Paul Jump reports

March 29, 2012

Research funding in England will be further concentrated in large research-intensive universities because of a redistribution of Higher Education Funding Council for England cash.

Figures show that the overall quality-related (QR) funding received by English members of the Russell Group will rise by 1.5 per cent in 2012-13. This compares with a fall of nearly 11 per cent for the Million+ group of post-1992 universities and of nearly 16 per cent for the GuildHE group of small, specialist institutions.

The total budget for QR research funding will remain steady at nearly £1.6 billion, but the proportion that goes to Russell Group members will increase from 70.2 per cent to 71.3 per cent.

The allocations of all the other mission groups will fall.

The figures reflect changes to the QR funding formula in response to the government's instruction that Hefce should finance research on the basis of international excellence alone.

Funding chiefs have now removed all funding previously allocated on the basis of 2* research: QR income will now be determined solely on the basis of 3* and 4* research - with 4* continuing to count for three times as much as 3*.

The £35 million freed by the change has been transferred to Hefce's QR Research Degree Programme (RDP), which subsidises the supervision of research postgraduates.

This money, which will amount to £240 million in 2012-13, is currently allocated on the basis of student numbers.

However, next year the formula will also take into account each unit of assessment's ratio of 3* and 4* research to the total of all its work rated 2* and above.

Critics of the modified formula argue that the quality of research output is unrelated to the quality of postgraduate supervision, but the new arrangements will result in a 23 per cent increase in the Russell Group's total RDP funding.

Meanwhile, in terms of overall QR money, the allocations of the 18 GuildHE members listed in the figures will fall by at least 7 per cent, with one losing 100 per cent.

Only two out of the 23 English Million+ institutions will benefit from rises, while even in the 1994 Group of smaller research-intensive universities, only three of its 14 English members will receive more QR income.

The biggest loser among mainstream universities is the University of Cumbria, which will lose 88 per cent of its RDP funding and 47 per cent of its QR budget overall.

By contrast, the overall QR allocations of 15 out of the 20 English Russell Group members will increase.

The largest amount of QR funding - £132 million - will go to the University of Oxford, a 2 per cent rise on last year.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com.




You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy