EIS snubs ‘exploratory talks’ on 2014-15 pay

Scottish union angry that current dispute not on agenda

March 3, 2014

A trade union has declined to take part in potential “exploratory talks” with universities ahead of 2014-15 pay negotiations because employers will not discuss this year’s pay dispute.

One of the five unions involved in higher education – EIS, which represents staff in Scottish universities and colleges – says it will not join other unions in preliminary talks with employers because “the remit of the proposed talks were too narrow”.

In a letter sent to members on 26 February, EIS national officer for further and higher education David Belsey says the talks would be unhelpful as there was to be no consideration of improving this year’s 1 per cent pay offer.

“The employers were clear that the exploratory talks would only cover preparations for the next pay claim, i.e. 2014-15 and would not cover the pay dispute which is based on the 2013-14 pay claim,” Mr Belsey writes.

“It has since become clear that the exploratory talks will also not cover the pay uplift for the 2014-15 negotiations – because the employers will not yet have completed their process in deciding what their pay offer will be,” he adds.

Out of the five unions involved in UK higher education, EIS has the fewest members in higher education and voted narrowly in favour of strike action in concert with the University and College Union, Unite and Unison.

The announcement of possible exploratory talks between unions and the Universities and Colleges Employers Association ahead of formal negotiations for 2014-15 pay, due to start on 26 March, had been viewed as a breakthrough that might lead to the resolution of an industrial dispute over this year’s pay offer.

Members of University and College Union are currently due to start a marking boycott on 28 April unless an improved deal is agreed – a move that follows a series of strikes over the past five months.

A joint statement by Ucea and UCU said the “exploratory talks would be to seek an early positive dialogue on the key issues in the lead up to the 2014-15 pay round”, but the EIS suggests pay will not be discussed.

The EIS snub follows a decision by its University Lecturers’ Association executive last month that said the proposed exploratory talks had “unacceptable pre-conditions”.

However, it will join other unions in the Joint Negotiating Committee for Higher Education Staff (JNCHES) process which begins with its first full meeting on 26 March, when employers will make their first pay offer for 2014-15.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham