Dundee job cuts plan prompts hundreds to sign petition

Around 900 people have signed a petition calling for the University of Dundee to stop “unnecessary job cuts” at the institution

April 12, 2014

The university wants to cut 120 academic staff as part of its “transformation agenda”, in a bid to make it as “robust and efficient an institution as it can be”.

It has commenced a voluntary severance scheme under which successful applicants would be paid 18 months’ salary as a lump sum, or in pension contributions. It hopes that this offer will help to avoid the need for compulsory redundancies.

However, 880 people have now signed an online petition calling for the university to reconsider. An open letter to principal and vice-chancellor Pete Downes says the plans will cause damage to Dundee’s reputation, research standing, student experience and recruitment.

“We would support your vision to transform the University if was implemented in a way that is genuinely in the interests of the University community,” it says. “Please show us that you are a truly visionary leader by listening to your staff and students and letting us help you to transform the University in a genuinely sustainable way without resorting to putting people out of work, increasing the workloads of already overloaded staff and risking the quality of student experience.”

One of the signatories, calling himself Ian C, comments: “A ‘surplus’ is likely to be of considerably less value to the university than 120 staff, particularly if the loss of reputation/diminution of teaching and research capacity are included in the equation. Please don’t do this.”

In a statement, the university said that it had to take into account “unprecedented pressures on public spending and some challenging future financial projections, not least relating to pensions and National Insurance contributions”.

“In taking its decision to reduce academic staffing levels, [the University] Court has agreed that we will do all we can to avoid making compulsory redundancies,” it continued. “We will therefore continue to consult with the campus unions and staff in accordance with our redundancy avoidance procedure and further proposals will come forward to Court in April.”


Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (3)

There will be a lobby of the Court meeting on 22nd April at 1.00. Students, staff and supporters will gather to let the University management know that we do not accept this damaging and unfair proposal. Please join us. You can sign the petition here https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/stop-job-cuts-at-university-of-dundee?source=facebook-share-button&time=1393089142
120 staff, 1.5 years of salary (assuming 50K per year as an average) gives 9 million sterling pounds used to mitigate the carreers ended by this transformation. One assumes significant further investment funds have been put aside to transform. How many academics at Dundee participate in the decision making process? Or is this another restruction...
The problem is that they are very unlikely to get 120 staff to take voluntary severance so it's looking more an more likely that there will be compulsory redundancies. There are also the issues of the way in which specific posts (so far mostly teaching posts) are being targeted that means that some people are getting the 'go before you're pushed' message. For the record, the Dundee Branch of UCU has made it very clear that we don't accept that either targeted job losses or compulsory redundancies are necessary or desirable. To answer the question about participation in the decisions, very few people have been consulted and even fewer have consented to this course of action.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Summer is upon northern hemisphere academics. But its cherished traditional identity as a time for intensive research is being challenged by the increasing obligations around teaching and administration that often crowd out research entirely during term time. So is the 40/40/20 workload model still sustainable? Respondents to a THE survey suggest not. Nick Mayo hears why

25 July