Draft law criticised

March 3, 2000

A European law expert has warned that draft regulations covering part time workers in further and higher education are badly flawed, writes Harriet Swain.

In a legal opinion delivered as the Department of Trade and Industry completed consultation on new regulations, Lord Lester QC said the regulations may not fully comply with European directives.

He also criticised maternity and parental leave regulations that came into force in December.

Lecturers' union Natfhe, public service union Unison and the GMB sought the opinion because of concerns over the government's narrow definition of "employees" as those with a contract of employment. They suggest that this definition was designed to exploit loopholes in the directive.

According to Lord Lester, EU Framework directives on parental leave and part timers' leave use the wider term "workers". This term is defined as having "a contract of employment or employment relationship", and it is used in all European anti-discrimination legislation.

One aim of the part-time directive is to protect those with unorthodox and informal working arrangements. The unions claim that the UK draft regulations will exclude most part-time and casual workers.

Lord Lester's opinion also states that the draft regulations will do little to meet government policy objectives such as promoting flexible working practices.

Paul Mackney, Natfhe general secretary, said: "We urge the DTI to go back to the drawing board to protect its own laws from challenge and over six million workers from discrimination."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns