Double RAE ratings

October 8, 1999

The improved consultation and transparency that accompany the forthcoming research assessment exercise are more than welcome.

The consultation highlights a major problem, however. It seems that the primary determinant of an RAE grade will be the quality of published work submitted - whether it is of international, national or sub-national quality.

But panels will also assess things that in many departments will be only weakly related to the quality of their published work, such as the number of research students, financial value of research contracts and grants awarded and whether a departed colleague has been replaced.

We urgently need to know, panel by panel, if such ancillary criteria can actually affect a department's grading -that is in the worst case, obscure recognition of top-quality work. But surely the most sensible way to solve the problem of measuring two incommensurable things would be to give each department two ratings: one for the quality of its publications and one for the general context in which research is conducted. In some cases, this could have the highly desirable effect of spotlighting those departments that are good but not very well supported by their institutions.

Andrew Fleming Department of archaeology University of Wales, Lampeter

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns