‘Disreputable’ Liverpool tactics provoke professors’ ire

Six hundred sign letter calling for return to negotiations

July 4, 2013

Source: ScoopWeb

Banner raised: 600 professors attack ‘disreputable’ practice

Six hundred professors have signed a letter condemning “disreputable” plans by the University of Liverpool to force its non-academic staff to accept new terms and conditions.

In the letter published in this week’s Times Higher Education, the professors, from universities across the UK and further afield, call on Liverpool to return to negotiations with trade unions over its plans to change the contracts of about 2,800 non-academic staff.

It follows Liverpool’s decision last month to start a 45-day consultation over plans to dismiss non-academic staff – about half its workforce – and re-employ them on revised contracts.

Unions claim the contracts are inferior and would require staff to work additional hours on evenings, weekends and bank holidays without appropriate compensation.

The letter brands the scale of Liverpool’s action as “unprecedented” in the UK academy.

“We are shocked that Liverpool, with its proud reputation for international excellence in a range of disciplines as well as its tradition of civic and regional service, is resorting to such disreputable industrial relations practices,” it reads.

“The fair treatment of all staff is vital to any university,” it says, adding that “clerical, technical, manual, administrative, library, computing and other specialist staff…make scholarly work possible. Academics could not do their jobs without them.”

The letter, which was organised by the University and College Union, follows a vote in favour of a strike ballot at Liverpool by the UCU, Unite and Unison. In addition, nearly 3,000 people have signed an online petition against the plans.

However, Sir Howard Newby, Liverpool’s vice-chancellor, said that negotiations with the unions over the plans to “standardise terms and conditions for staff” were still in motion.

“Far from breaking off negotiations…as the UCU claims, we are holding positive and constructive weekly discussions, and will continue to do so in the hope of reaching an agreement,” Sir Howard said.

The UCU said that it had held meetings with the university regarding the consultation, as required by employment law, but Liverpool had refused to negotiate over the content of the new contracts.

Sir Howard said that workers would receive “excellent but modernised terms and conditions”, while the move would ensure “fairness and equality…across the institution” for different types of support staff.

“We will not be making any of our staff redundant, as they will remain in the same jobs but on revised terms,” he added.

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham