Dismay over dropout rate at private colleges taking SLC cash

Department for Business, Innovation and Skills signals that it may remove sub-degree qualifications from the higher education budget

June 26, 2014

Source: Alamy

Funding fears: maintenance loans could be scrapped for those on HN courses

The government has admitted that retention rates are “very low” at some private colleges, as officials show growing concern over how some for-profit institutions are benefiting from public funding.

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills has also signalled that it may remove from the higher education funding system sub-degree higher national qualifications, which have attracted soaring numbers of students under the policy of unlimited expansion for private providers allowed by David Willetts, the universities and science minister.

Allegations of misuse of public funding by the London School of Science and Technology centred on claims that students could sign up to HN courses to access Student Loans Company funding, but fail to attend classes.

Meanwhile Pearson, the FTSE 100 education company that awards HN qualifications and is paid by colleges offering them, has launched what it calls a “major review” of the courses.

Vocational higher national certificates and higher national diplomas allow private colleges to offer SLC-funded courses under an arrangement with Pearson, rather than having to reach the validation agreements with universities that would be needed to offer degrees. One for-profit, St Patrick’s International College, recruited 4,000 students with SLC funding to HN courses in just one year – equivalent to the size of a small university and giving it more SLC funding than the London School of Economics.

BIS hosted a meeting for private providers on 17 June to explain why it is considering requiring them to supply information to the Higher Education Funding Council for England, by making their courses “prescribed” under the Further and Higher Education Act 1992.

A presentation given by BIS officials, seen by Times Higher Education, explains that the move is “to ensure students and government are getting value for money”. It adds that there is “very little data on outcomes from some alternative providers. Some evidence suggests that a few alternative providers have very low retention rates.”

On 19 June, BIS published a consultation on changes to further education funding. The consultation proposes moving HNs “from higher education funding to [further education] Advanced Learning Loans”. It also poses the question of whether maintenance loans should be scrapped for students pursuing HNs if the courses are transferred to the further education budget.

BIS says in the consultation that “expansion in [HN] provision at private (alternative) providers has not been in priority vocational areas”. It also notes that Pearson’s HNs are “the only external awarding body qualifications to attract higher education funding (other than some teacher training courses)”.

BIS’ spokesman said that there were “no plans to remove designation of HNCs/HNDs for student support in the 2014-15 academic year”.

Pearson’s consultation, which closed in May and will lead to changes from September, says the company is looking to “update and improve” HNs and asks for views on whether the qualifications are “sufficiently rigorous and demanding”.


Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham