Derby v-c backtracks to offer increased pay

March 17, 2000

Derby University's vice-chancellor Roger Waterhouse has promised to raise lecturers' pay in the face of a threatened vote of no confidence and industrial action.

Professor Waterhouse told The THES this week he was hoping to bring the university's pay scales up to nationally agreed rates next year, despite holding them down for four years and allegedly telling union chiefs "the issue on pay is closed".

Members of lecturers' union Natfhe, who picketed the university court on Wednesday and have been running an academic boycott, were threatening a vote of no confidence in Derby's management and ballot on strike action unless Professor Waterhouse met them to agree a 0.6 per cent pay rise.

The escalating dispute increased pressure on Professor Waterhouse as Derby faced further revelations this week about its troubled operations in Israel.

He said he would be "delighted" to meet Natfhe representatives, who would find themselves "pushing at an open door" on the question of increasing pay. He said the university had always intended to bring pay scales up to national rates, but had been held back by a "tight" budget.

"I hope we will build into our budget for next financial year a pay increase that means our scales are at or better than national scales," he said.

Derby branch chairman Gary Towler said Natfhe would insist that part-time lecturers should also be paid more, that all lecturers received back pay and that there were no redundancies to meet the cost of the increases. "Each lecturer is owed about Pounds 500," he said.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs