Cultures and crises discussed by academics and arts leaders

Nations are “always in crisis”, a former director of the Institute of Contemporary Arts has argued, as he praised the arm’s-length system of public funding embodied by the Arts Council, which meant that artists did not have to be polite or grateful to governments.

January 21, 2012

Ekow Eshun made the remarks during a debate at the University of Sussex, part of a series of ‘Sussex conversations’, bringing together academics and leading figures in the world of culture and heritage.

“Pretty much every nation is always in crisis,” Mr Eshun said. “The arts are good at embracing dissonance and acknowledging the awkwardness of our national culture. All true art is controversial and raises hackles.”

Also speaking at the event on 19 January were Sir Neil Coussins, former chairman of English Heritage, and Dame Fiona Reynolds, director-general of the National Trust, who spoke about the preservation of Britain’s industrial heritage and a “mixed economy” approach which had led to “a democratization of heritage and the validation of non-expert views”.

Peter Boxall, professor of English at Sussex, raised questions about “whether the nation as an organizing framework is losing some of its power”.

“Some of us think of ourselves as living in Brighton and in Europe”, he explained, with the national dimension much less important.

Dr Boxall was also sceptical about Mr Eshun’s argument: “If the purpose of art is dissonance and difference, it is hard to imagine a government framework to achieve that,” he said.

A member of the audience raised questions about restitution and the “dark history” of National Trust houses built on the profits of slavery.

Another challenged the speakers to say more about reconciling the tensions between the preservation and progress, and the difficulties of talking about “the national heritage” and “our culture”.

Mr Eshun responded that, as someone from a Ghanaian background, “I deliberately use the phrase ‘our culture’ to stake a claim to where I want to live, against those who want to exclude me. There’s nothing passive about the phrase – it’s a statement of intent.”

matthew.reisz@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan