Community patent (Extract from the Presidency background note on the Competitiveness Council of 26 Nov)

November 22, 2002

Copenhagen, 21 Nov 2002

The Council will take stock of the situation regarding the proposed Community patent system, following on from work at its meeting on 14 November on the jurisdictional arrangements.

The discussion will cover both the jurisdictional arrangements and the dossier as a whole. In the light of this, the presidency is expected to draw conclusions on a way for taking work forward in the coming months.

Following the discussions on 14 November, the Council noted that further work was necessary on the jurisdictional system and on the dossier as a whole. At its meeting on 21 May, it had adopted conclusions of a procedural nature, having been unable to accept a proposed common approach on the main issues (the role of national patent offices, languages and costs, distribution of fees, the jurisdictional system and the review clause).

The Community patent system, which is provided for in a proposal for a Council Regulation, is aimed at creating a single patent that would be valid throughout the Community. Patents would be granted by the European Patent Office in Munich in accordance with the requirements and procedures laid down in the European Patent Convention and its implementing Regulation.

The European Council has emphasised on several occasions that the Community patent must be an efficient and flexible instrument obtainable by businesses at an affordable cost, while complying with the principles of legal certainty and non-discrimination between Member States and ensuring a high level of quality.

The proposal is based on articles 308, 225a and 229a of the Treaty (unanimity in the Council; consultation procedure).

http://www.eu2002.dk/news/news_read.asp? iInformationID=25094
Danish Presidency Website http://www.eu2002.dk/main/

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns