Commission publishes performance indicators for Networks of Excellence

October 26, 2004

Brussels, 25 Oct 2004

The Commission has published a guidance note for participants in its research framework programme, providing performance indicators for the assessment of Networks of Excellence (NoEs).

During the recent high level evaluation of the new instruments introduced under the Sixth Framework Programme (FP6), the panel's report concluded that there is widespread dissatisfaction within the European research community concerning the definition and application of NoEs and Integrated Projects.

In its guidance note, the Commission points out that while NoEs will be varied in their nature, content, structure and objectives, they will all have the common aim of overcoming fragmentation. The key requirement is to establish a set of verifiable indicators for measuring progress, it continues.

These indicators should include both quantitative goals that can be checked easily each year, such as the number of exchanges of personnel between the network partners, as well as qualitative goals, such as progress in terms of convergence of training programmes, that may require a deeper analysis.

Not only should these indicators be used to assess progress towards achieving the network's overall goal of durable integration, according to the Commission, but also to measure progress in reaching those intermediate milestones necessary to achieve the overall objective.

In stressing the importance of selecting indicators that measure true progress, the Commission explains: '[T]he setting up of common tools by the participants, although an indispensable condition to durable integration, does not per se demonstrate their will and actuality of durable integration. The existing and increasing use of these common tools by all participants will constitute an illustration of progress towards integration.'

The guidance note concludes with a list of examples of expected final results for a Network of Excellence, along with possible intermediate steps and indicators of the progress achieved. The Commission makes it clear that the list of final and intermediate results is not exhaustive, concluding: 'They are meant to provide examples of what could be expected from a network aiming at achieving a satisfactory level of integration at the end of the Community funding period.'

To download a copy of the guidance note, please consult the following web address:
http:///europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/i nstruments_en.html

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities
Item source: http:///dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?C ALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN= EN_RCN_ID:22821

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns