College saves with profit-related pay

January 24, 1997

UNIVERSITY College London is considering a profit-related pay scheme even though tax relief on PRP will soon be phased out.

Provost Sir Derek Roberts said the proposal was unrelated to attempts to overcome a 10 per cent funding deficit. He said this aim had largely been achieved by increasing income through additional research and more postgraduate and overseas students.

Sir Derek said consultations on PRP would be held over the next two months, and that the scheme would give staff more pay and raise cash for library improvements.

Following the changes made in the November budget, a PRP scheme would be economic for only one or possibly two years.

In a letter to all staff, Sir Derek said a feasibility study indicated that the scheme would produce a Pounds 1.2 million "saving". This would be shared equally between the college and staff, who would receive a 1 to 2 per cent rise in net pay, and a cash bonus of 1 to 2 per cent at the end of the first year (December 1998).

If UCL decides to go ahead staff will be balloted by May 30. If 80 per cent of staff are in favour, the scheme will begin on August 1.

Sir Derek said the Association of University Teachers' opposition to PRP was "stupid". "They're crazy. If there's an opportunity just for one year to make the odd extra million pounds to put into improving student facilities, why the hell are the AUT against it?" Helen Donoghue, AUT branch president, said: "I can't believe they are going down this road when (tax breaks on PRP schemes) are being phased out." She added that Sir Derek's letter failed to mention that participating staff would have to give up some salary. She believed PRP could pave the way for performance-related pay in the long term.

Tom Silverlock, branch secretary of Unison, said PRP was of more benefit for well-paid staff and did little for many Unison members.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns