Coalition were close to scrapping fees, claims Hughes

The coalition government was close to abolishing fees in 2010 and introducing a "graduate contribution system", the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats has claimed.

September 25, 2012

Simon Hughes told a Lib Dem conference event in Brighton last night that the plan was blocked by civil servants, by universities and by fears any delay in legislation would lengthen student protests.

At the event on the future of universities, hosted by the Social Market Foundation and Universities UK, Mr Hughes looked back to events following the publication of the Browne Review of higher education funding in October 2010.

He said the Lib Dems "would not have had such a difficult ride at all had we persuaded the civil servants and our coalition colleagues of something that I think we could have persuaded them of...and that is that we could have voted to get rid of tuition fees by repealing that piece of legislation and introduce a short piece of legislation - and that's a graduate contribution system."

Mr Hughes said the proposed graduate contribution system "was a very short distance away from the [National Union of Students] position".

Looking at why the proposed policy "unscrambled", he said that "universities, in particular, backed by the civil servants, said...'It can't wait any longer, we need to know what the fees are going to be'".

Mr Hughes said universities' fears at the time over the urgent need to include 2012/13 fees in prospectuses were "not necessary", as the legislation for a graduate contribution system could have been in place by January or February 2011.

He added of the longer process needed for graduate contribution legislation: "The government business managers...they were unnerved that we could have had not just one big day of student demonstrations...but two weeks of it, getting nearer to the elections in the spring of 2011."

But Mr Hughes said: "Had we done it that way in the end we [the Lib Dems] would have had much less flak, the government would have had much less flak, students would have been much less angry, and we would still have addressed the question of how you get more money into the system for higher education at a time of economic difficulty."

Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of UUK, told the event that UUK believed the coalition "did the right thing" by increasing the fee cap.

The Liberal Democrats "should be admired" for their stance on fees, she added, and the sector owed Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister, and Vince Cable, the business secretary, "a debt of gratitude".

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan