Coalition responds to MPs' concerns over UKCMRI

The government has dismissed concerns over the decision to base the UK Centre for Medical Research and Innovation in central London.

September 13, 2011

In May, the Commons Science and Technology Committee published a report into the centre, which will be known as the Francis Crick Institute, in which it said that the rationale for building it in the St Pancras area of the capital was “not overwhelming”.

It acknowledged the benefits that good transport links and proximity to universities and teaching hospitals will bring for the centre, but said that such advantages came at the price of increased construction costs and a site incapable of expansion.

It suggested that it might have been better to build the centre outside the South East, adding that as things stand it would reinforce the concentration of life sciences in the “golden triangle” of London, Oxford and Cambridge.

In its response to the report, published today, the government acknowledges that there is an additional cost to the central London location, but insists that this will be outweighed by the benefits.

“The location of the institute was chosen to lie amidst a cluster of centres of scientific and clinical excellence, a deliberate choice to enable interactions with these existing centres,” it says.

“The government agrees with the committee that the costs of constructing an institute of this scale in London are probably higher than they would be elsewhere.

“We believe that these are additional costs are outweighed by the additional benefits of locating the institute close to a large number of existing centres of excellence.”

Other points addressed in the government’s response include questions of safety and security raised by local residents, over such issues as animal rights extremism.

“It is essential that whatever the location of bioscience laboratories, the facilities must have robust security measures in place,” it says.

“The government is satisfied that the institute has risk assessment arrangements in place, and notes that the risks involved are not unique to UKCMRI.”

john.gill@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'