CNAA era lessons

February 21, 1997

TONY TYSOME reports the view of Geoffrey Alderman that a new standards agency "is bound to eventually become a kind of super Council for National Academic Awards" (THES, February 14).

Having worked both for that body, as chair of a subject board, and for one of the present funding councils as a teaching assessor, there is no doubt in my mind that the CNAA, while far from perfect, was broadly on the right lines.

It was based, inter alia, on the proven method of peer review, on a continuing though changing body of expertise, and on face to face interaction and judgement.

At its best, this encouraged innovation and autonomy as well as ensuring standards.

In contrast the present system constitutes an outmoded and discredited inspectorial approach.

It is of crucial importance that the lessons sometimes painfully learned from the CNAA era, which are consistent with those of the whole history of higher education, should not be lost.

John Radford

Emeritus professor of psychology, University of East London

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Peer Therapist

Royal Holloway, University Of London

Manager, Internal Programs

Khalifa University

Nurse Lecturer

Bpp University

Medical Research Specialist I

United Arab Emirates University