Charities more generous than MRC in funding studentships

£100,000 PhD funding from the Macular Society and Fight for Sight outstrip offers via MRC doctoral training partnerships

August 28, 2014

Medical charities are offering PhD studentships worth considerably more than those offered by research council programmes, it has emerged.

The Macular Society is to fund a doctoral studentship with a total value of £100,000, which is £17,000 more than the sum offered for research council-funded PhDs outside London. The charity’s six-figure offer covers student stipend, tuition fees and consumables for three years commencing in 2014-15.

An equivalent studentship from the Medical Research Council is worth a minimum of £23,159 in the first year. The MRC funds its PhD studentships for three and a half years and the amount awarded each year is incrementally increased during the programme, bringing the total to at least £83,000 over the course of a PhD. Studentships based at institutions in the capital get an enhanced stipend of £2,000 per year, according to figures on the MRC’s website.

Tony Rucinski, chief executive of the Macular Society, said that it wants to fund the highest quality and best value research. “We understand that good research doesn’t always come cheap,” he said.

The society felt it “prudent” to at least match the Research Councils UK minimum student stipend, and looked at other charities’ awards when arriving at the figure.

“Fight for Sight offer £100,000 studentships for three years, and while other funders are more flexible in the maximum amount they fund, the figures remain comparable,” Mr Rucinski said. Last grant round, Fight for Sight offered nine studentships, according to its website.

Mr Rucinski said that applicants must “fully justify” costs, and its research committee reviews them “to make sure they are accurate and realistic”.

An MRC spokesman said that the values published on its website were “based on existing MRC research funding already in place” and that “universities with MRC Doctoral Training Partnerships have the flexibility to use the funding to provide higher levels of support”.

Participating universities could make awards of three or four years, “depending on the needs of the student and the project”, he said.

holly.else@tesglobal.com

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham