Britain's lone plea to cut ESA spending

October 13, 1995

British officials will next week call on the European Space Agency to slash its Pounds 0 million annual budget by 25 per cent over a five-year period.

At a meeting of space ministers from ESA member countries Britain will stand alone in demanding that savings can be made by ESA through measures such as better procurement strategies and more efficient management structures without causing any damage to programmes.

Britain pays Pounds 40 million a year in subscriptions to ESA through the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council, but only has Pounds 10 million to spend on domestic space science projects. Cutbacks in government funding for PPARC however, mean that even this Pounds 10 million is under pressure.

PPARC and Department of Trade and Industry officials believe the efficiency savings made by ESA could lead to a far better distribution of Britain's total financial commitments to the agency. The subscriptions could come down eventually to Pounds 30 million and the Pounds 10 million saving could be transferred to PPARC's domestic space science programme, doubling the amount of money the council can spend on development of space instrumentation and sophisticated methods of handling data from satellites. Britain is suggesting that the reductions could be carried out over five years in 5 per cent stages.

ESA has so far resisted Britain's moves although it is understood the agency has agreed in principle that a cut of less than half the 25 per cent British target could be considered.

But Britain is expected to stick to its guns at next week's meeting. Officials hope that the stand will force other member states to shift their position. France, Switzerland and the Netherlands have so far insisted that they want to keep the budget unchanged.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns