Boycott of TV MMR debate under attack

December 12, 2003

Scientists and doctors who backed out of a potentially hostile television debate about the measles mumps and rubella vaccine wasted an important opportunity, key figures in science communication have claimed, writes Anna Fazackerley.

The debate will be shown on channel Five on Monday, after the screening of what scientists have labelled a "dangerous" drama about a mother who teams up with scientist Andrew Wakefield to try to prove there is a link between her child's autism and the MMR vaccine.

Scientists and doctors from the Department of Health, the Medical Research Council and key London hospitals agreed to boycott the debate, fearing the odds were stacked too heavily against mainstream science.

The Science Media Centre, set up to encourage more scientists to take part in controversial discussions such as this, tried to change their minds.

Fiona Fox, director of the centre, told The THES : "Our concern would be that rather than sending a powerful message, empty seats left by the scientists just leave the public hearing the silence from those experts best qualified to comment on the risks."

Liberal Democrat MP Evan Harris, who stepped in at the last minute to speak in favour of the vaccine and had a robust altercation with Dr Wakefield on stage, described the event as "appalling".

He said: "We did the best we could but it was pitched halfway between Kilroy and Jerry Springer."

Dr Harris said that someone had to take part but said that a medical expert would have made a more convincing case than a politician.

Those who boycotted the debate this week stood by their decision.

Helen Bedford, a lecturer at the Institute of Child Health, said: "It became obvious that it would be very difficult to have a reasonable debate after one-and-a-half hours of a very emotional film."

Colin Blakemore, chief executive of the MRC, called the debate "underhand".

He said: "It was pretty clear the debate had been set up as a device to validate the documentary."

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns