Between systems, one dead, one stuck in legislative limbo

Inchoate regulatory regime contains 'risk of instability', report finds. John Morgan reports

May 17, 2012

The switch to a new funding regime and delays to the government's higher education bill have created a part-changed regulatory system that contains "a risk of instability" and "may not be fully equipped to function", according to a report by England's funding council.

The Interim Regulatory Partnership Group (IRPG) was established by the Higher Education Funding Council for England and the Student Loans Company to advise the government, Hefce and other agencies on issues arising from the development of the reformed funding and regulatory regime.

The IRPG's first project, Mapping the Higher Education Funding and Regulatory System in England, written by a team from Hefce and Deloitte, delivers a warning in the conclusion of its summary report.

It notes that "the dramatic changes to the funding landscape in academic year 2012-13, coupled with uncertainty about the HE bill, have left the system in a partially changed state ... The project's conclusion is that the system as it stands may not be fully equipped to function and that there is a risk of instability if existing gaps in the system are not filled."

No bill, no bite

The delay in turning the government's higher education White Paper into a bill has created a number of regulatory issues.

The White Paper, published last summer, contained plans to give Hefce a far stronger regulatory position as a "consumer champion" - but as yet there is no prospect of legislation to establish the role.

Under the old system, Hefce attached terms and conditions to grants through its financial memoranda with institutions, giving it the power to withdraw grants.

But as grant is replaced by SLC funding, Hefce's ability to withdraw money as a sanction on behalf of the Office for Fair Access "will hold less weight", the report says. It also notes: "The SLC is not a regulator and there is currently no clear accountability for teaching funding that is distributed via tuition loans."

The White Paper contained plans to create a "level playing field" between universities and private providers, bringing the latter under Hefce's beefed-up powers.

The IRPG report notes the "uneven regulation of private providers" in the absence of the required legislation.

Some private providers are "outside the remit of review by (the Quality Assurance Agency)", it notes.

"In addition, private providers are not subject to student number control, which means that the (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills') budget for tuition loans is not controlled in this area."

The report also contains a graphic illustrating the sector's "complex and potentially confusing" regulatory system (see below).

According to the document, the IRPG should "urgently engage with BIS to agree how the system can be reformed, with or without legislation; and also agree a second phase of the project which will make recommendations for a new funding and regulatory system in the short to medium term".

The report was published on 4 May, the week before the Queen's Speech unveiling the government's legislative programme for the 2012-13 session of Parliament.

As expected, the speech contained no reference to a higher education bill.

Regulatory road map: perhaps we should have packed the satnav?


The current oversight system for UK higher education, sketched in the diagram, is ‘complex and potentially confusing’, according to the Interim Regulatory Partnership Group. Its report says that it is time to ‘urgently engage with BIS to agree how the system can be reformed, with or without legislation’. * European Association for Quality Assurance † Professional, statutory and regulatory bodies ‡ NHS Business Services Authority Source: Hefce/Deloitte/SLC


john.morgan@tsleducation.com.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Monster behind man at desk

Despite all that’s been done to improve doctoral study, horror stories keep coming. Here three students relate PhD nightmares while two academics advise on how to ensure a successful supervision

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Reflection of man in cracked mirror

To defend the values of reason from political attack we need to be more discriminating about the claims made in its name, says John Hendry

But the highest value UK spin-off companies mainly come from research-intensive universities, latest figures show