Bedfordshire takes its medicine over appeals

A university's appeals process for PhD students has been criticised as inconsistent, unclear and unfair by the Quality Assurance Agency.

July 26, 2012

The standards watchdog was called in to investigate the University of Bedfordshire after an external examiner complained about the case of a doctoral student whose appeal against a "fail" judgement was upheld by the university.

The examiner said Bedfordshire had contravened its own code of practice by failing to discuss with the original panel of examiners how the appeal might be resolved.

External examining was also undermined because the institution failed to explain to the examiner why the candidate's work - a PhD by publication - had been referred to appeal, it was claimed.

After its investigation, the QAA highlighted several flaws in Bedfordshire's procedures.

Its report finds that the appeal hearing was not conducted impartially, with the panel's chair able to "disproportionately influence the process and outcome" because the same person also chaired the postgraduate awards committee.

Deliberations on the evidence by the panel were, according to the formal record, superficial and uncritical, it adds.

Bedfordshire's requirements for a PhD by published work were also unclear to all concerned, the regulator says.

The QAA has made four recommendations and ordered the university to draw up an action plan to address its concerns.

A university spokeswoman said the regulator had not questioned Bedfordshire's academic standards but rather criticised its procedures.

"At the time, we did not have a process in place for handling PhD appeals specifically, mainly because they are extremely rare: in fact, we had never had any such appeals," the spokeswoman added.

"So, in the event, we followed our normal appeals procedure and gathered together a new panel of examiners to reassess the work.

"We are grateful to the QAA for pointing out this omission and have now put in place a comprehensive PhD appeals procedure."

jack.grove@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns