Ban reading lists to drive teaching innovation, librarian says

Conference hears educators are neglecting technology because of ‘obsession’ with dated approaches

March 17, 2017
Women lying on giant book
Source: Alamy

Academics should stop using the term “reading list” because it leads to an over-reliance on paper-based books and sidelines online learning materials, a senior university librarian has argued.

Criticising an “obsession” with reading lists, Jane Harvell, head of academic services and special collections at the University of Sussex, said they cause lecturers to create courses in which electronic resources and technology-assisted learning are only an afterthought.

“I would like the phrase ‘reading list’ to disappear altogether,” Ms Harvell told Digifest, a two-day conference organised by the technology consortium Jisc, which took place in Birmingham on 14 and 15 March.

Speaking to Times Higher Education at the event, Ms Harvell explained that the centrality of reading lists means technology-enabled learning has become “separate” from the body of literature covered by lecturers.

“We need to get away from the idea that you create a reading list for the module and then design the course around it,” she explained, saying educators should think more about technology when designing courses.

The term “reading list” is particularly unhelpful because it is “overwhelmingly linked with a list of printed books”, Ms Harvell added.

“We should stop thinking about it in this way – a reading list can be a chapter available electronically or simply an image,” she explained.

The concept of the “reading list” is also somewhat obsolete because “students are not toddling across the library” to borrow titles and are often accessing resources remotely instead, Ms Harvell added.

Embracing the use of electronic resources is also vital because budgetary restraints mean it is impossible for university libraries to stock sufficient copies of required texts, she added.

Librarians are sometimes told two weeks in advance what titles will be on the reading list, Ms Harvell explained. “There can often be hundreds of books on these lists,” she said. “We cannot afford to buy so many copies and students are not going to buy them,” she added.

However, the electronic textbooks that are currently on offer do not always suit the needs of students as they cannot interact with them as they might a physical copy of their own, Ms Harvell said.

“Students want to pull out chunks of text or scribble on these texts, but they can’t in their current form,” she said. “There must be ways to do clever things with these digital resources which students want, but the big publishers that universities use tend to be very conservative."

“Some small edtech companies are doing exciting things, but the bigger higher education institutions don’t want to take risks so they stick with the larger providers,” she added.

jack.grove@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham