Back-up plan mitigates risk of double trouble

Academic work that is entered into the research excellence framework as worth "double" a normal submission can, in every discipline, be accompanied by a "reserve" option in case reviewers do not agree that it should count twice, it has been decided.

January 26, 2012

Draft guidelines for the four main REF panels had suggested that only arts and humanities submissions would be allowed to include a back-up choice in case panellists failed to be convinced that work of "extended scale and scope" - such as a book - should be double-weighted.

This would have meant that research in other fields risked being marked down if reviewers disagreed that an "output" was worth double - as the researcher concerned would then be left with three instead of the four pieces of work needed for REF assessment.

But following concerns raised in a consultation on the panels' criteria and working methods, submissions across all disciplines will now be able to include a reserve "output".

The change is among a number of alterations made in the final panel guidelines, due to be published next week, in a bid to make the process more "consistent" across all disciplines and to reduce the burden on institutions.

Others include reducing the information required on the contributions made by co-authors, a cut in the amount of data needed on technicians and research degree students in some physical science disciplines, and a decision to include more examples of what constitutes impact in the social sciences.

The language used in the panel guidelines has also been made more similar "wherever the same meaning is intended".

"Wherever there isn't a reason to differ it's been made consistent," said Graeme Rosenberg, REF manager at the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

Publication of the final panel criteria will act as the starting gun for institutions to begin preparing their submissions ahead of the REF deadline in November 2013.

The changes follow a decision announced last year to allow women to submit one fewer output to the REF for each period of pregnancy they experience during the census period.

simon.baker@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan