Artists shouldn't be ‘colonised’ for impact, scholar says

The pressure for academics to deliver “public engagement” should not lead to them “colonising the creative arts”

October 26, 2014

That was among the views put forward during a panel discussion on Artists in the Academy that highlighted both the challenges and the benefits of such collaborations.

The event, which took place at the British Academy on 21 October, opened this year’s Inside Out Festival, which showcases the contribution of London’s universities to the capital’s cultural life.

Philip Crang, professor of cultural geography at Royal Holloway, University of London, described a number of projects that brought creative artists into his department out of “a shared interest in developing the geographical imagination”.

Research on the wider theme of “diaspora space” and cultural mobility, for example, had included the work of an artist who incorporated and manipulated South Asian textiles in her work. Yet it was he who also suggested that “we need to be wary of academics colonising the creative arts” as a painless way of delivering “public engagement”.

Choreographer Jasmin Vardimon said she was keen to “encourage more intelligent writing about dance and performance”. Though her work built on extensive research, it was often analysed in purely visual terms, with audiences unwilling to “read the book between the lines”. She had found it very stimulating, therefore, to receive feedback from architects, psychoanalysts and researchers in other disciplines as part of her work at the University of Wolverhampton.

Di Mainstone described her experience as an artist-in-residence at Queen Mary University of London, where she developed the Human Harp project and produced a clip-on instrument that enables a performer to transform a suspension bridge into a giant harp. Although she enjoyed the freedom that came from being “the odd-one-out in the department of electrical engineering”, she also noted that it had changed her artistic process, since she now feels that she has to “produce results and think more like a researcher”.

Dominic Johnson, senior lecturer in drama at Queen Mary, said it was natural that artists looked to the academy as other sources of funding seemed to be drying up. Yet he worried that this could lead to universities adopting a very instrumentalised and entrepreneurial approach to the arts that excludes “those who work in more experimental, open-ended ways”.

matthew.reisz@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham