Heads of schools of architecture have criticised moves by the Royal Institute of British Architects to shake up architecture degree courses. They say RIBA's proposals, which split five years of architecture training into undergraduate and postgraduate elements, are ill-conceived. In a letter to RIBA, David Dunster, chairman of the Standing Conference of Heads of Schools of Architecture, says abandoning the year out after the third year will weaken links between education and practice. SCHOSA wants "confirmation of full funding" for the various models proposed by RIBA and argues that the different awards and models suggested "seem over-complex".
Please
or to read this article.Register to continue
Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.
Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:
- Sign up for the editor's highlights
- Receive World University Rankings news first
- Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
- Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis

Already registered or a current subscriber?