Agenda of the 161st Meeting of the COST Committee of Senior Officials, 15-16 March 2005

February 28, 2005

Brussels, 25 Feb 2005

Full text of Document 723/05

Information Items

  • Adoption of the agenda
  • Welcome address and presentation
    • - Mr. Jyrki Myllyvirta, Member of the Committee of the Regions
  • Presentation of the updated COST video 2005
  • Information from:
  • Status of FP7 and role of COST

    Items for approval

  • Summary of Conclusions of the 160th meeting COST 341/04 + COR 1
  • Action-related items COST 224/05
  • Approval of new Action proposals
  • Requests for extension of the duration of COST Actions
  • Further derogation of power to JAF COST 231/05
  • Requests for participation from non-COST institutes
  • Quality control in COST COST 222/05
  • Call for proposals COST 223/05
  • Domain restructuring and domains review COST 214/1/05 REV 1
  • Budget allocation by domain 2005 and preliminary budget 2006 COST 217/1/05 REV 1

  • COST Fund
  • Statement of revenue and expenditure as at the end of the financial year 2004 COST 201/05
  • Designation of auditors for the COST Fund for 2005
  • Possible support to ECMWF 30-year jubileum book
  • Contributions by the applicant countries

  • Assessment of COST-ESF MoU COST 225/05

    Items for examination

  • Issues related to the Mid-term Review COST 215/05
  • Prioritisation in COST
  • Utilisation of results of completed Actions
  • Any other business

    Council Register Previous Item Back to Titles Print Item

  • Please login or register to read this article.

    Register to continue

    Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

    Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

    • Sign up for the editor's highlights
    • Receive World University Rankings news first
    • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
    • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

    Have your say

    Log in or register to post comments

    Most commented

    Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

    3 October


    Featured jobs