Agency is 'stifling' degree baby at birth

November 8, 2002

Quality watchdogs are in danger of stifling the development of the foundation degree with too many regulations, the qualification's original architect has warned, writes Tony Tysome.

David Robertson, head of policy development at Liverpool John Moores University, said that the Quality Assurance Agency must tread a fine line between assuring quality and preventing innovation in foundation degrees. If it does not, it could "kill off" the qualification.

But Professor Robertson said the QAA was right to keep a watchful eye on colleges delivering foundation degrees that had poor quality inspection records.

Such colleges should be encouraged to think twice before entering into partnerships or consortia to offer the qualification, he said.

Professor Robertson's warning follows the publication of the QAA's final draft benchmark defining the distinctive characteristics of the foundation degree.

He said he agreed with the QAA's definitions in its benchmark statement. It says that work-based learning, accessibility, clear progression routes to higher levels, employer involvement and flexibility are key features of the qualification.

But although the QAA said its benchmark was not meant to be prescriptive, Professor Robertson feared institutions could feel intimidated by it.

He said: "The QAA's requirement to define quality signals to institutions that they should not take risks in an environment where they need to do so in order to be innovative."

The foundation degree is expected to play a key role in achieving the government's 50 per cent participation target for higher education.

Insiders said Professor Robertson's call for lower tuition fees for foundation degrees to boost their popularity had been accepted by the government.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns