Affluent children reach top universities no matter the system

Study finds little difference in levels of inequality in England, US and Australia as privileged families do ‘whatever it takes’ to gain advantage

July 26, 2015
Wealth disparity (illustration)

The varying design of higher education systems around the world has little impact on the ability of privileged families to dominate access to elite universities, according to a study.

Researchers found that the handicap faced by children from disadvantaged families trying to enter leading higher education institutions was broadly similar – even after prior educational attainment was taken into account – in England, Australia and the US.

This suggests that, despite “substantial differences” in how higher education is organised across these countries, affluent families “will do whatever it takes to seek out qualitative advantages within the system that they face”.

John Jerrim of the UCL Institute of Education, Anna Chmielewski of the University of Toronto and Phil Parker of the Australian Catholic University publish what is thought to be the first comparative study of its kind in a forthcoming edition of Research in Social Stratification and Mobility.

They calculate that high-achieving children from privileged backgrounds in England have a 53 per cent chance of entering a Russell Group university, compared with a one in four chance for their disadvantaged peers. The chances of not entering higher education at all are one in 20 and one in five, respectively.

The results for the US were similar, with high-achieving children from advantaged backgrounds having a 58 per cent chance of entering a highly selective university, compared with 27 per cent for the less privileged group. The prospects of not entering any university were 8 per cent and 27 per cent, respectively.

In Australia, high-achieving children from affluent backgrounds have a 45 per cent chance of entering a Group of Eight institution, compared with 22 per cent for disadvantaged students. The respective chances of these students not entering higher education at all were 11 per cent and 24 per cent.

Only private colleges in the US were significantly harder to gain entry to for disadvantaged groups than international comparators.

“High socioeconomic status families in different countries face very different post-secondary education landscapes, yet this does not seem to significantly alter their ability to dominate high-status college enrolment,” the study concludes. “Rather, they seem to be able to adapt, continuing to use their resources to the greatest possible effect to ensure that educational inequalities are maintained.”

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham