A third of REF subpanels to use citation counts

A third of the subpanels in the 2014 research excellence framework intend to use citation information.

August 4, 2011

The news comes in the REF panels' draft panel criteria and working methods, put out for consultation last week by the Higher Education Funding Council for England, which manages the exercise on behalf of all four UK funding councils.

Of the 36 REF subpanels, 12 intend to use citation counts, including all six bioscience subpanels and four from the physical sciences: chemistry, physics, earth systems and environmental sciences, and computer science and informatics.

Citation information will also be used by two social science subpanels: geography, environmental studies and archaeology, and economics and econometrics.

But all panels have emphasised that citation data will be used only to inform, rather than replace, the peer review of outputs. The data will be drawn from standard citation databases, although the computer science subpanel will also be permitted to use Google Scholar.

The subpanel's chair, Steve Furber, ICL professor of computer engineering at the University of Manchester, said experience of the 2008 research assessment exercise suggested that using both databases was the best way to take account of some of the differences in publication behaviour in computer science, such as the importance of conference papers, which are less well indexed by standard databases.

"We were also of the collective view that the community we are assessing will have more confidence in the process if we look at (both)," he added.

Each main panel's draft criteria also set out the kinds of evidence it will accept for the impact element of the REF, which will count for 20 per cent of final scores.

The research underpinning impacts must have occurred since 1 January 1993 except for the architecture, built environment and planning subpanel, whose cut-off will be five years earlier to reflect the length of time it can take for "changes to the built environment to be delivered in practice".

Academics are also invited to comment on a number of general issues, including the circumstances in which researchers may submit co-authored entries or fewer than the standard four outputs. Responses must be received by 5 October.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

http://tinyurl.com/3monzet

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Capsized woman and boat

Early career academics can be left to sink or swim when navigating the choppy waters of learning scholarly writing. Helen Sword says a more formal, communal approach can help everyone, especially women

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan