A shake-up too far

April 17, 1998

Your description of the proposed Institute for Learning and Teaching is a depressing read (THES, April 10). Far from being a "radical shake-up", it looks like the old formula of using a solution to define a problem.

Thus the institute will "use the outcomes of research to stimulate innovative teaching". What do those words mean? Innovation that has to be stimulated sounds about as convincing as spontaneity that has to be organised.

And the "research" itself? Will it be allowed the possibility of discovering that different students at different times in different subjects with different teachers benefit from different approaches? Or that "good practice" depends on the values of the interpreter? I suspect not. Instead, we shall find that those whose values are to be implemented will be setting the context of the so-called research.

For teachers the message is: classroom teaching will be rewarded with mere associate membership; those who teach how to teach will be grandee fellows.

Michael Harry. Louth, Lincs

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments