A 'right' or wrong

September 8, 2000

Sarah Fitzpatrick (Opinion, THES, September 1) reminds us of the claim that graduates earn on average Pounds 400,000 more than non-graduates over their lifetime. That means Pounds 88,000 to Pounds 160,000 additional income tax per student.

Full funding seems a good investment if her argument is followed. However, my idealism has long gone and I appreciate the need for this generation to squeeze tomorrow's as much as we can get away with. But why loans, parental savings and a sprinkling of scholarships?

I have yet to hear a convincing argument against full fees and maintenance being financed through a permanent extra 2 per cent or so income tax on the beneficiaries. No debts, no stigma, greatly reduced administration.

Rob Henderson Department of mathematics and statistics, Lancaster University

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments