20 Planck labs risk axe

February 7, 2003

About 20 pure research laboratories operated by the Max Planck institutes face closure following a decision by the German federal ministry for education to cut funding.

Although a general increase of 3-3.5 per cent was promised across the board for all research bodies, the ministry has decided that only the German Research Association (DFG) will get an increase of 2.5 per cent.

Researchers and administrators reacted with dismay, and the challenged the minister of education, Edelgard Bulmahn, to explain why the ministry budget of 8 million (£5.2 million) did not cover the costs of the DFG and the Max Planck institutes.

Arend Oetker, president of the German Association of Private Donors, said the Social Democrat and Green coalition government "was sending an absolutely wrong signal" to the rest of the world.

Dr Oetker said that about 1,500 researchers would be put out of work by the decision.

He demanded that the government meet its share of the costs. In 2002, the private sector increased its contribution, while state spending was reduced to 35 per cent.

"Entrepreneurs will not accept a further reduction in government spending," Dr Oetker warned.

In 2002, the association, which administers private scholarship and grants for about 347 foundations, increased donations from industry by 1.6 million, bringing total funding to 30.4 million.

On top of this effort by German industry to fund more research, another 30 foundations were registered with the association last year. These enjoy a total funding capital of 80 million to be spent each year on scientific projects.

The Sueddeutsche Zeitung warned that top German scientists would either leave the country in search of more secure working conditions or change careers.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns