Lower fees won’t play with voters, Rammell warns Labour

V-c Bill Rammell suggests £6,000 charges are not a priority for most voters. John Morgan writes

September 26, 2013

A former Labour minister has told the party that its policy to lower fees will not win votes.

Bill Rammell, vice-chancellor of the University of Bedfordshire, criticised the policy at a fringe meeting during the Labour conference in Brighton this week.

At its 2011 conference, the party unveiled a holding policy to lower fees to £6,000 if it were in power at that time. It may consider committing to the policy at the next general election or opt to review higher education funding after the poll – which would mean accepting £9,000 fees in the short term.

It is thought unlikely that Labour will shift policy to a graduate tax before the 2015 election.

With student numbers bouncing back under higher fees, some question whether cutting fees, a potentially costly alternative, would win enough votes to make the gamble worthwhile.

Speaking from the audience at the fringe event, hosted by Million+ and the National Union of Students on 23 September, Mr Rammell said: “I cannot conceive that in the limited fiscal room for manoeuvre the party will have after the next general election that [£6,000 fees] would politically be the right priority.”

Mr Rammell, who was Labour’s higher education minister between 2005 and 2008, added: “And bluntly, this issue does not shift votes on the doorstep in anything like a sizeable number of parliamentary constituencies…given the need to properly fund our higher education system, I think the party needs to get itself into a better position.”

Times Higher Education asked Mr Rammell after the meeting if he believed it would be best for Labour to accept £9,000 fees.

“In the short term, I think yes. I don’t think there is evidence that [higher fees] have put students off,” he replied.

But he added that the current system was “unsustainable”, with one solution involving raising the “level of interest rate” on student loans.

However, Mr Rammell was challenged by Paul Blomfield, Labour MP for Sheffield Central and a panel member at the event. He told him that because of the “huge noise” Labour made in opposing the coalition’s fee rise, “we have got to have an intelligent and different narrative to offer…at the next election”.

Mr Blomfield said his favoured graduate tax could be implemented on a “cost-neutral” basis. He added, jokingly: “All it needs is a change in Treasury accountancy rules.”

Shabana Mahmood, Labour’s shadow higher education minister, was absent from the panel after injuring her leg falling down some stairs. Her replacement, Lord Stevenson of Balmacara, read her speech. On Labour’s policy for 2015 and beyond, he said in the speech that “we haven’t yet made our decision”.

He added that “an announcement was made some time ago that had we been in power we would lower fees to £6,000 and maintain funding levels for universities. That’s the starting point and we should keep that in mind.”

john.morgan@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham