We need Ucas to be open

August 13, 2015

We read with frustration Andrew Grice’s recent article in The Independent on Ucas’ refusal to release student data. Higher Education Access Tracker is a collaboration of more than 40 English universities working to evaluate the impact of fair access programmes. The article talks about “suspicions that higher education institutions would rather data be kept secret as it would expose their record on fair access”. This is unfair and certainly not the case for Heat member universities. Heat has been lobbying Ucas for two years to release student data for research purposes. We argue that the non-release of individual data – which allows us to link student background, outreach engagement and student outcomes – is an obstacle to robust research. Our university members are committed to the provision of research to help us understand what is effective in reducing the social class gap in student higher education participation and success.

Heat members recently tracked about 60,000 students who had participated in a range of university outreach programmes to find out if they subsequently entered higher education. More than three-quarters of these students had no parental background in higher education, and many were classified as disadvantaged. Some 32 per cent of disadvantaged students went on to higher education, and this compares with an average progression rate of 25 per cent for students from similar disadvantaged backgrounds. What’s more, Heat universities now know that the majority of outreach participants stay on and achieve their degree (89 per cent). Tracking outreach participants through to employment reveals that 79 per cent end up in a job classified as a higher level socio-economic occupation. We believe that this research is robust and provides evidence of the impact of the outreach activities that Heat universities are delivering each year to low-performing schools and colleges and disadvantaged students. We also know that this research would be even richer if Ucas would release individual data so that we could fully research the application behaviour of disadvantaged students, currently a missing part of the Heat research jigsaw.

Sharon Smith
Director, Higher Education Access Tracker

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham